Free Book Online
Book The Feynman Processor : Quantum Entanglement and the Computing Revolution (Helix Books Series) by Gerard J. Milburn (1999-12-01)


The Feynman Processor : Quantum Entanglement and the Computing Revolution (Helix Books Series) by Gerard J. Milburn (1999-12-01)

2.3 (1511)

Log in to rate this item

    Available in PDF - DJVU Format | The Feynman Processor : Quantum Entanglement and the Computing Revolution (Helix Books Series) by Gerard J. Milburn (1999-12-01).pdf | Language: UNKNOWN

Sorry, description is temporarily unavailable.

4.3 (3768)
  • Pdf

*An electronic version of a printed book that can be read on a computer or handheld device designed specifically for this purpose.

Formats for this Ebook

Required Software Any PDF Reader, Apple Preview
Supported Devices Windows PC/PocketPC, Mac OS, Linux OS, Apple iPhone/iPod Touch.
# of Devices Unlimited
Flowing Text / Pages Pages
Printable? Yes

Book details

  • PDF | Unknown pages
  • Basic Books (1725)
  • Unknown
  • 8
  • Other books

Read online or download a free book: The Feynman Processor : Quantum Entanglement and the Computing Revolution (Helix Books Series) by Gerard J. Milburn (1999-12-01)


Review Text

  • By A customer on May 2, 2000

    This book reminds me of Stephen Hawking's ``A Brief History of Time'', in that it consciously and conspicuously omits mathematical symbolism beyond high-school level. IMHO, this is a mistake, as it renders the material opaque, thereby serving neither the amateur nor the professional. Although it's almost heresy to say so, Emperor Hawking's book had no clothes.Although I have some knowledge of mathematics and quantum mechanics, the tiresome translations of concise expressions into long-winded textual explanations left me confused and bored. I feel that the lay person will also skim over them as completely as if they had been the original formulae.That said, the material is important, as is expressing these concepts to a broader audience. The book is well-organised, and deserves more work. I humbly request a second, edited edition.

  • By A customer on December 4, 1998

    Is meant to be for the lay-person, but unfortunately Milburn isn't as good at exhaustively explaining the bizarre world of the quantum as, say, a John Griffin. This book is more for people with some understanding of both computer science and quantum mechanics, as this is a nice explanation of where they converge. You can't quickly gloss over both disciplines and expect to have your readers understand them, but that's what Milburn tries to do. However, for what I needed, it delivered.

  • By A customer on May 22, 1999

    Gerard's book, is somewhat aimed at an audience well above its actual content. Its slightly advanced setting is probably better placed in a higher level forum than that of a popular science text.

  • By A customer on July 17, 2000

    This is a decent book for someone trying to get and overview of how quantum computing works. The author seems to get bogged down in the details, however. The mathematical examples are poorly worded and thus not very clear, the variable names are also quite hard to keep track of.This is certianly a book where you will have to read certain paragraphs two or three times to make sure you have it right.

  • By Leo Dirac on March 6, 2001

    This book is clearly written by a physics professor who doesn't spend much time talking to people who haven't studied physics. I would guess his editor falls into this category as well. The back cover praises its accessibility, a marketing gimmick as obviously deceptive as the sensationalistic chapter names. For example, one chapter, "Teleportation for Gamblers" is named after an obscure quantum phenomenon that has been dubbed teleportation for no apparent reason, has nothing to do with gambling, and is only referred to in passing.The first four chapters try to give an overview of quantum mechanics to those who haven't studied physics. Even after spending 4 years earning a Bachelor's in Physics, I was only barely able to follow the discussion. If I did not already understand the principles he was explaining, I would never have been able to fill in the holes of explanation.But my biggest complaint about this section is that he bases the entire discussion on calculating probabilities in a quantum environment. But in trying to avoid complex math, he leaves out essential details. The much more intuitive explanation of superposition of states (whereby an object is in two places or states at the same time) he barely mentions in this section. If the material was presented in this way, all the math would be unnecessary, and the interesting second part of the book would make much more sense.Beyond that, the book contains numerous factual mistakes. His Turing machine for multiplying on page 99 just doesn't work. On page 109, he says that if you have N objects, and for each object you need to store N pieces of information that have a total of N^N pieces of information. The correct answer, N^2, makes his point much less dramatic.The last two chapters are interesting indeed. They discuss what is possible with a quantum computer, and the state of research in 1998. I recommend that if you do buy this book, only read the last two chapters. If you can't follow it, look anywhere else for an explanation. The first four chapters will not help.

  • By Jack_Nitski on July 22, 2015

    Reading unfinished, this is a document of thought-bending topics: Probability and Physical models converge.Heady topics often requiring contemplation or research, prior to moving forward.

  • By j bryan on January 12, 2014

    Timely reading with ongoing US and Swiss quantum computing research currently newsworthy due to NSA wanting fast processors to break codes in the war on terrorism.

  • By A. Shiekh on September 3, 2005

    Mathematics was invented for a reason, and the avoidance of even simple mathematics makes this book near unintelligible. Further, the habit of versing quantum theory in terms of genetics, real and imagined, further separates the subject mater from the reader; and giving Feynman credit for how probability amplitudes add would probably not please him at all. Give this one a wide berth and read instead 'The quest for the quantum computer' by Julian Brown which is everything this book is not.

  • Name:
    The message text*: